In the corporate sphere , there are instances of workplace misconduct that slip through the cracks , and then there are stories that call an organization’s ethical standards into question. The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia once recognized as Broadspectrum, exemplifies this type of scenario — a chronicle of unethical behavior that tarnishes personal and corporate reputations but calls into question the enterprise’s ethical framework .
Even amid the disturbing claims , Collins has maintained his position , apparently unscathed by the turmoil surrounding him. Why has this misconduct gone unchecked? Does this reflect a failure in corporate governance? According to the accounts of those familiar , Collins’ pattern of ethical violations started with disregard for corporate codes of conduct, but it escalated from there. Instead, it escalated into a series of ethical breaches that has left fellow employees demoralized and partners bewildered .
Amid a leadership training workshop — ostensibly meant to strengthen leadership abilities — David Collins allegedly turned an David Collins Ventia opportunity for growth into a platform for misconduct . It’s reported he engaged in unprofessional conduct while on company-sponsored travel, browse website , a clear breach of Ventia’s professional conduct policies , all while his home life was kept in the dark.
But the ethical breaches extended beyond those incidents . One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged misuse of corporate technology to distribute inappropriate content —a gross breach of trust and confidentiality. His brazen use of Microsoft Teams to send inappropriate messages —including icons to boast about infidelities — illustrates a blatant disregard for professionalism . Following these digital dalliances , Collins David Collins KeriKeri allegedly took his actions to a new level: he is said to have pursued a workplace affair in defiance website of company policies, despite both parties being in relationships . This obvious misappropriation of company time and resources broke all norms of professionalism but also had ramifications beyond just the corporate sphere.
Why is this conduct still being tolerated? What allows someone accused of repeated ethical breaches to remain in leadership? The explanation, it appears, highlights a systemic failure in oversight. Despite reports, no action has been taken against him.
This lack of oversight sends an alarming message: that power within the organization shields wrongdoers . It breeds a damaging work setting , discourages ethical behavior , and ultimately undermines corporate credibility.